- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:10:47 -0500
- To: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
On Oct 27, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com> wrote: > Gregg, > > I too am pleased with the direction this is going. > > I feel the "common block" needs some per-SC tweaking / augmenting. Agree. the common block is just the common part. Look at the first SC and you will see there is already extra text beyond the common block for that one. > > For example, in Bypass Blocks, I think there should be a Note detailing some of the "mechanisms" for bypassing may be in order (e.g. skipping over the previews in a set of movies in a movie trilogy, to get directly to the main menu; etc.). > > We also had draft text for earlier versions of Multiple Ways that clarified the ease with which that was met. I think it is important to have that here - the "common block" doesn't address that. see above. I think more notes is good. Propose them? > > Finally, I would like to also note for software that we also had problems determining what was a "navigational mechanism". propose text? > > > Regards, > > Peter thx Gregg
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 06:11:16 UTC