W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Discussion Draft of last 3 provisions -- using Document and Software language

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:10:47 -0500
To: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
Cc: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org Force" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Message-id: <FC4CE951-6022-4626-ABC7-D1E37E2782B2@trace.wisc.edu>

On Oct 27, 2012, at 11:54 PM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com> wrote:

> Gregg,
> I too am pleased with the direction this is going.
> I feel the "common block" needs some per-SC tweaking / augmenting.  

Agree.  the common block is just the common part.  Look at the first SC and you will see there is already extra text beyond the common block for that one. 
> For example, in Bypass Blocks, I think there should be a Note detailing some of the "mechanisms" for bypassing may be in order (e.g. skipping over the previews in a set of movies in a movie trilogy, to get directly to the main menu; etc.).  

> We also had draft text for earlier versions of Multiple Ways that clarified the ease with which that was met.  I think it is important to have that here - the "common block" doesn't address that.

see above.  I think more notes is good.   Propose them?
> Finally, I would like to also note for software that we also had problems determining what was a "navigational mechanism".

propose text? 

> Regards,
> Peter


Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 06:11:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:47 UTC