W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > October 2012

RE: Closed non-embedded content???

From: Kiran Kaja <kkaja@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:47:36 +0100
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>
CC: "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <14C0E778294B30498B5912136BFA6F570192926D7884@eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com>
But it is the user agent/eBook reader/hardware device that is closed and prevents access by AT. Adobe Digital Editions is an application to read protected eBooks. This application works perfectly well with assistive technology such as screen readers and screen magnifiers. If a certain other platform decides to block access to AT to their eBook reading application, it isn't the non-embedded content that is at fault.

Regards,
Kiran Kaja
Adobe Systems

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu]
Sent: 19 October 2012 13:57
To: Michael Pluke
Cc: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
Subject: Re: Closed non-embedded content???

yes  - a large percentage of ebooks to start.
Ditto for movies and anything else with DRM that blocks access by AT.


Gregg
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info
Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - http://Raisingthefloor.org
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project -  http://GPII.net

On Oct 19, 2012, at 7:48 AM, Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com<mailto:Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>> wrote:


Is there such a thing as non-Web non-embedded content that is closed?

Can anyone think of any examples? We need to answer this question urgently. In all the cases that we can think of it is the device (i.e. the user agent) that is closed.

Best regards

Mike
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 13:48:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:47 UTC