- From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:46:30 -0700
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- CC: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50005EF6.1070500@oracle.com>
Hi Gregg, PK: OK, I see now that Proposal #3 and Proposal #4 for 3.1.2 Language of Parts <https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/home/3-understandable/31-make-text-content-readable-and-understandable/312-language-of-parts> are actually quite different; adding in "User Interface Context" in the Note of proposal #4 is only a small part of the re-work. And... as you say below, "that is just a note and the word used there are not important". So I suggest we survey 3.1.2 for our Tuesday meeting, and I suggest the survey ask folks to look at both proposals #3 and #4 -> to say whether they prefer one or the other, or would prefer either with xx changed, or that both are bad. Andi? Peter On 7/13/2012 1:56 AM, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > * > * > > On Jul 13, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Peter Korn wrote: > >> Gregg, >> >> >>>> <PK> >>>> Gregg, in your e-mail below you wrote that you guys did new >>>> proposals for 2.4.6 and 3.1.2. Neither of those mention "web >>>> page", nor did I see anything new there. Did you mean those SCs or >>>> other ones? >>> >>> >>> GV: 2.4.6 is a typo of some sort since 2.4.6 is already a closed item. >>> I can't find any other open item so... just ignore it. don't >>> know what would go in its place. >>> >>> >>> 3.1.2 - there is a new proposal #4 >> >> PK: Sorry, I missed it. Didn't see "web page" in the SC, and when I >> scanned for "User Interface Context", I didn't make it through the >> Note to see it there toward the end. I don't see how this is an >> improvement. Why not just say "...it can be assumed that all TEXT >> within that document or USER INTERFACE ELEMENTS with that application >> will be using the same language unless it is indicated"? Since we >> only care about the text of the UI elements, we could even simplify >> further to: "...it can be assumed that all TEXT within that document >> or application will be using the same language unless it is indicated" > > *GV2: that is just a note and the words used there are not important. > Just using terms consistently. You could use "parts" there and > it would work as well. * > * > * > *GV2: the key here is the paragraph above that. * > > >> >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> <oracle_sig_logo.gif> <http://www.oracle.com/> >> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal >> Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522> >> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 >> <green-for-email-sig_0.gif> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle >> is committed to developing practices and products that help protect >> the environment >> >> > -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal Phone: +1 650 506 9522 <tel:+1%20650%20506%209522> Oracle Corporate Architecture Group 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note: @sun.com e-mail addresses will shortly no longer function; be sure to use: peter.korn@oracle.com to reach me ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 17:47:09 UTC