W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Two review versions of WCAG2ICT

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:20:15 -0600
To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Cc: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>, WCAG2ICT <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Message-id: <24737F51-F973-4FBC-991B-183059FFCEF0@trace.wisc.edu>
And another big THANKS to you Michael for getting this all together before the WCAG meeting tomorrow. 


Gregg
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info
Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - http://Raisingthefloor.org
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project -  http://GPII.net

On Dec 12, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> wrote:

> Peter Korn wrote:
>> 
>> Michael,
>> 
>> 
>> On 12/12/2012 12:31 PM, Michael Cooper wrote:
>> I now see: "Additional guidance when applying {Guideline | Success Criterion} [x.y{.z}] to Non-Web Documents and Software Aspects of Products:" everywhere.  That's half of the change, but I thought it would end at "Software".  Not still "Software Aspects of Products".  
>> 
>> Thus (I thought) it would read: "Additional guidance when applying {Guideline | Success Criterion} [x.y{.z}] to Non-Web Documents and Software:"
>> 
>> Could you please make that further change?  [note that since "Software" is one of our key terms and that definition incorporates "software products or software aspects of hardware-software products", we are fine ending each "Additional guidance" lines at "software".
> Sorry, everything's blurring I guess and I missed that detail. Fixed now.
>>   
>> Yup, looks good.  If they require our back-up plan, you'll also need to put brackets around [set of non-web documents] and red-ify it...
> Right, overlooked that; fixed in the staging version.
> 
> Also there was a small tweak to the 3.2.4 modified text based on what Gregg referenced in the WCAG survey. The rest of Gregg's comments I think were +1 to Peter, so I believe it's caught up to this point in the thread.
> 
> Michael
> -- 
> Michael Cooper
> Web Accessibility Specialist
> World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
> E-mail cooper@w3.org
> Information Page
> 
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 02:20:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 December 2012 02:20:47 GMT