W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > December 2012

Re: 12/6 WCAG2ICT meeting

From: Andrea Snow-Weaver <asnowweaver@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:25:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKNDW9EDbHUo7irzGfOL5tZ1sabwoaCZ6uTOJbhVFG8a_EyPAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
Cc: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Sorry about that. We were planning to have a meeting tomorrow to discuss
the draft. Just sent out an agenda.

Andi


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com> wrote:

>  Hi gang,
>
> I think we should meet tomorrow - if nothing else, to discuss the feedback
> we (are going to) get from WCAG WG in their meeting earlier today.  But we
> have also been filling out our own survey, which is also worth discussing.
>
> The WCAG WG feedback on our draft was the following:
>
> The Working Group has four comments for the WCAG2ICT TF:
>
>    1. consider removing SC 1.4.4 from the list of those excepted in
>    Closed Functionality - perhaps it is appropriate for this to not be a
>    requirement in closed, but that isn't for WCAG to say; and further the text
>    in Appendix A that characterizes the intent for 1.4.4 is incorrect (user
>    agents are one way of achieving this, but the SC states that it must be
>    achieved);
>    2. consider defining "set of documents" explicitly in the "key terms"
>    section;
>    3. advice for SC 3.2.4 isn't consistent with the other "set of
>    software" advice, and currently has the old text "an electronic document or
>    a software user interface" which clearly should be replaced;
>    4. since we only refer to potential gaps, "this document is not
>    sufficient by itself to ensure accessibility ..." should really be " this
>    document MAY not be sufficient by itself to ensure accessibility..."
>    (unless there are specific known gaps, in which case it would be helpful to
>    list some examples)
>
>
> RESOLUTION: The above four comments shall be submitted to the TF for their
> consideration
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> On 12/6/2012 6:34 PM, Mary Jo Mueller wrote:
>
> Not sure if there will be a meeting in the morning, but I will not be able
> to attend.  I have completed the survey with my comments. If you have
> questions regarding any of them, I'll be in the office in the afternoon and
> can discuss via email or phone then.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mary Jo Mueller
> Accessibility Standards Lead
> IBM Research ► Human Ability & Accessibility Center
> 11501 Burnet Road, Bldg. 904 Office 5D017, Austin, Texas 78758
> 512-286-9698 T/L 363-9698 *
> **maryjom@us.ibm.com* <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
>
> *IBM Accessibility* <http://www.facebook.com/IBMAccessibility> on
> Facebook ▼ *IBMAccess* <http://twitter.com/IBMAccess> on Twitter ▼ *IBM
> Accessibility* <http://www.linkedin.com/e/vgh/2419815/> on LinkedIn*
> “If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and
> become more, you are a leader.”  ~ John Quincy Adams*
>
>
> --
> [image: Oracle] <http://www.oracle.com>
> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
> Phone: +1 650 5069522 <+1%20650%205069522>
> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065
> [image: Green Oracle] <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is
> committed to developing practices and products that help protect the
> environment
>


green-for-email-sig_0.gif
(image/gif attachment: green-for-email-sig_0.gif)

oracle_sig_logo.gif
(image/gif attachment: oracle_sig_logo.gif)

Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 04:26:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 December 2012 04:26:32 GMT