W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Interaction Context + UI + Content

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:53:00 -0500
To: "Hoffman, Allen" <Allen.Hoffman@HQ.DHS.GOV>
Cc: Michael Pluke <Mike.Pluke@castle-consult.com>, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Message-id: <52CB4726-B262-4489-8DCC-84DAFB169BD4@trace.wisc.edu>

On Aug 13, 2012, at 7:52 AM, "Hoffman, Allen" <Allen.Hoffman@HQ.DHS.GOV> wrote:

> I think the problem we are having with 2.4.5 for documents is that even when we apply it it either requires authors to change the content itself, or rely on outside functionality to provide alternatives.  What are the analogs to the sufficient we provide in WCAG now which would be acceptable outside the Web scoping?

It wouldn't require you to change the content if the content were already met this provision. And why is it unusual that something that does not meet the criteria would have to change in order to meet it. This is true for webpages as well. What am I missing?

Received on Monday, 13 August 2012 13:53:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:45 UTC