W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org > August 2012

How 2.4.5 Multiple Ways ought to apply to software

From: Bailey, Bruce <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:55:58 +0000
To: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, "public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org" <public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C18AC41C570F214AAD320947DF8D16CE7F6D5A41@BLUPRD0810MB354.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
For Tuesday, might we survey if task force members believe that most (all?) software falls into the "except where the [X] is the result of, or a step in, a process" half of 2.4.5?

I submit that WCAG has a pretty broad definition of "process".  Please see Example 2:  "An account registration page requires successful completion of a Turing test before the registration form can be accessed."
http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#processdef


From: Andi Snow-Weaver [mailto:andisnow@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 7:07 PM
To: public-wcag2ict-tf@w3.org
Subject: ACTION: Meeting Preparation Survey for tomorrow - Please answer before the meeting if possible

Sorry for the late notice. At tomorrow's meeting, we're going to step back from the issue of finding a replacement term for "web page" and discuss how task force members fundamentally believe 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks and 2.4.5 Multiple Ways ought to apply to software.

To help structure the discussion, we have prepared a survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/55145/AUG102012/

Please answer it before the meeting if you can. I won't set the usual 6 AM US Eastern time deadline.

Andi
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 11:56:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 August 2012 11:56:41 GMT