W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > February 2007

RE: Spam: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:08:12 -0600
To: "'Sofia Celic'" <Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org>, "'Andi Snow-Weaver'" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003d01c75437$c6663530$a117a8c0@NC84301>

Grin

This is one where the distraction provision is combined with the 'time to
read it' provision.    Hence it's location under a guideline that is focused
just on 'time to read it'.

Interesting.

Do we create another 'distraction' guideline separately that reads like the
"background sound" provision?


Gregg
 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sofia Celic
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:26 AM
> To: Gregg Vanderheiden; Andi Snow-Weaver; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Spam: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review
>
>
> Does the context of the Guideline provide a scope of
> non-decorative content?
>
> The guideline is "Allow users to control time limits on their
> reading or interaction". Is the user's reading and
> interaction deemed to include decorative content?
>
> Sofia
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu]
> Sent: Mon 19/02/2007 5:19 PM
> To: Sofia Celic; 'Andi Snow-Weaver'; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
> Subject: Spam: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review
>
>
>
> It would be required to restart everything else but not decorative.
> Its hard to figure out how to do that without getting complicated.
>
> Stop all. Restart all non-decorative.   (any 3 second exception here?)
>
>
> Gregg
>  -- ------------------------------
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sofia Celic
> > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 12:05 AM
> > To: Andi Snow-Weaver; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: 1169 ready for Team C review
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure about this one. If " it is not required to provide a
> > mechanism to restart the movement to conform to this
> Success Criterion
> > "
> > then we shouldn't use a word that suggests this requirement
> in the SC.
> >
> > How about we say something like:
> > "Content can be stopped, and restarted as necessary, by the user
> > unless the timing or movement is part of an activity where
> timing or
> > movement is essential"
> >
> > Sofia
> >
> > ____________________________
> >
> > Dr Sofia Celic
> > Assistant Manager Online Accessibility & Senior Web Accessibility
> > Consultant Vision Australia - Accessible Information Solutions
> > 454 Glenferrie Road
> > Kooyong, Victoria, 3144
> > P: +61 (0)3 9864 9284
> > F: +61 (0)3 9864 9370
> > E-mail: Sofia.Celic@visionaustralia.org.au
> > www.visionaustralia.org.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andi
> > Snow-Weaver
> > Sent: Saturday, 17 February 2007 7:23 AM
> > To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
> > Subject: 1169 ready for Team C review
> >
> >
> >
> > Per my action item yesterday, I have modified 1169. The
> agenda section
> > on the Team C page doesn't look current so I'm not sure
> what process
> > you guys are using now. But we should discuss this one on Monday.
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_indivi
> > dual.php?i
> > d=1169
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > << ella for Spam Control >> has removed 492 Spam messages and set
> > aside
> > 207 Later for me
> > You can use it too - and it's FREE!  www.ellaforspam.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 15:08:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:49 GMT