Please review my proposal for LC-978 [1], LC-1197 [2], and LC-1252 [3] We have 18 open issues left in for minimize-error. Most of the issues are labeled as cognitive, AT push, or level-change which I think means they should be in the [HOLD] category even though only 4 were when I looked. I found one of mine (LC-1057) which should be on hold per the comments so I changed it. LC-1171 [4] offers a simple suggestion for a new L3 SC but I think it is too broad even for Level 3. Should we reject this one? LC-1294 is the same issue as 1057 - the GL is about helping users avoid mistakes but we don't have any L1 or L2 SC that actually do that.. [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=978 [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1197 [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1252 [4] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/issue-tracking/viewdata_individual.php?id=1171 AndiReceived on Monday, 13 November 2006 21:31:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:48 GMT