W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > November 2006

FW: SC 2.2.5, LC 1048 and LC 1288

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:13:31 -0800
To: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C17DCB9B.1C2AE%lguarino@adobe.com>

Sorry - I managed to send this to the wrong mailing list.

------ Forwarded Message
> From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:56:09 -0800
> To: "public-wcag-teamc@w3.org" <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
> Conversation: SC 2.2.5, LC 1048 and LC 1288
> Subject: SC 2.2.5, LC 1048 and LC 1288
> Resent-From: <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 14:57:01 +0000
> 
> 
> I have the assignment to write the response for why we are not changing the
> level of SC 2.2.5, as requested in LC 1048 and LC 1288. We are keeping SC
> 2.2.5 at level 3 because it cannot be met by all content.
> 
> However, these comments seem to be asking specifically that automatic page
> refreshes be prohibited at L1 or L2. I think that SC 2.2.1 would already
> address automatic page refreshes. Is my understanding correct? Should we add
> this situation as a common failure for 2.2.1?
> 
> Loretta
> 
> 

------ End of Forwarded Message
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 15:13:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:48 GMT