W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamc@w3.org > October 2005

RE: GL 2.5 L2 SC 1

From: Sofia Celic <sofia.celic@nils.org.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:35:38 +1000
To: <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <LJEEKBBBNGHHOJHGKNLFKEMADLAA.sofia.celic@nils.org.au>

Thank you for the response Andi.

Are these decisions based on (X)HTML's capabilities then? ie, instead of
being technology-independent?
Apologies for all these questions that were probably discussed and decided a
long time ago. I do appreciate the time taken to answer them!

With regards,
Sofia


-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teamc-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Andi Snow-Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2005 9:14 PM
To: public-wcag-teamc@w3.org
Subject: Re: GL 2.5 L2 SC 1



Sofia asks:

Why this SC isn't at level 1?

It's because this requirement affects the visual design of the delivery
unit. Level 1 can all be done in the code regardless of the visual design.

Andi
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 00:35:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:47 GMT