W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > March 2007

Re: RE: RE: SC 2.4.6 wording

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:47:54 +0000
Message-ID: <e2a28a920703050747u23fa815erb15b306cfa55afd8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sean Hayes" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lorettaguarino@google.com>, "Tim Boland" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>, "Slatin, John M" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, TeamB <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>

On 05/03/07, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> wrote:
Between discontinuous blocks, navigate to the first link of the inline
progression order in some other block (either the nearest block in the
block progression direction, or the inline progression direction, at
the authors choice).

Instead of link, could we use "interface element that can receive
focus" or "interface element", so that it's less specific?

Best regards,


Supplement your vitamins
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 15:48:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:55:35 UTC