W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > September 2006

RE: proposal for 4.2.1

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 00:47:55 +0200
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002f01c6df62$99e468f0$6b4ddb46@NC6000BAK>
I think there was a strong desire to point out that it has to be up to date.
So maybe

 

When [multiple versions of a Web unit] are available, at least one version
conforms at Level A and is most recent update. Any version that does not
conform at Level A provides a mechanism to obtain an up to date version that
does, and that mechanism meets all Level 1 success criteria.


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
<http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9>  

  _____  

From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 3:16 AM
To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
Subject: proposal for 4.2.1

 

Based on today's discussion and Greg's stab, here is another proposal for
wording SC 4.2.1:

 

When [multiple versions of a Web unit] are available, at least one version
conforms at Level A. Any version that does not conform at Level A  provides
a mechanism to obtain a version that does, and that mechanism meets all
Level 1 success criteria.

Glossary entry:

multiple versions of a Web unit:

Web units in the same natural language that provide all of the same
information and functionality <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/> 

 

Is this getting any closer?

Loretta Guarino Reid

lguarino@adobe.com

Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering 
Received on Saturday, 23 September 2006 22:50:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:45 GMT