W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > June 2006

RE: Latest version of Checklist

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:58:48 -0500
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009901c689ac$0286d990$8b17a8c0@NC6000BAK>
Excellent

Will make this change

 

 


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b
<http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9>  

 

 


  _____  


From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:14 PM
To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org; public-wcag-teamc@w3.org;
public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Subject: RE: Latest version of Checklist

I like a lot of Team A's proposed wording; it address some other issues that
we noticed but didn't address.

 

Perhaps we could modify the last line to say

If you check a technology, its common failures are listed since they must
always be avoided. If you also check "in the baseline" for the technology,
then its techniques are listed since they may be used when satisfying the
success criteria.

 

 

 

Is the wording we proposed to fix this problem work for you too?

 

see

http://preview.trace.wisc.edu/~vander/Annotated%20Checklist%20Latest/ 


Gregg
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2006 20:59:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:44 GMT