W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teamb@w3.org > June 2006

CAREFUL CRITICAL review of the Annotated Checklist

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 00:37:29 -0500
To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>, <public-wcag-teamc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00ce01c68606$a4c02760$6401a8c0@NC6000BAK>
The annotated checklist gives us (and everyone else when we release it) a
very easy way to evaluate our success criteria and proposed techniques.   


I would like people from each Task force to take the success criteria that
they are assigned and 

- look over the annotated checklist very carefully.

- pretend you are a harsh critic. - Rip up what we have.  Find the holes.  


Releasing this can make our guidelines understandable and usable - but that
can be overshadowed if we have obvious holes in it as well. 

Even if you know it is solid - if you think it could look like it has holes
- or could be misunderstood - point that out. 


Do your worst.   Please do it immediately.




Looking forward to finding and fixing any holes or oversights. 




Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
< <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848  

The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 



Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 05:37:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:24 UTC