RE: A few more proposals: 971, 1110, 1293

> Do we have an example that uses the phrases "Click here" or 
> "more"? As well as being particularly poor link phrases, link 
> phrases like "Click here" make assumptions about how the user 
> will interact with the content. I know that's fine by us, but 
> it shouldn't be encouraged by us.
> 


Agree 

Just checked.  

As I suspected. We don't have any examples of  "click here" in Understanding
WCAG 2.0 or any of the techniques docs.    We also don't have "more..."   
I don't THINK we have any  "More" but that is harder to check for.  Did a
quick check.  Found none.  


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gez Lemon
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: Loretta Guarino Reid
> Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org
> Subject: Re: A few more proposals: 971, 1110, 1293
> 
> 
> On 29/08/06, Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > Please review for our meeting.
> 
> Comment: #971
> 
> I'm happy to go with the proposed response for #971, but what about:
> 
> "Titles, headings, and labels are descriptive and appropriate 
> for the content."
> 
> Would that address his concerns?
> 
> We could then give an example of how something could be 
> descriptive and appropriate, and an example of something that 
> is descriptive and inappropriate as a failure.
> 
> Comment: #1110
> 
> Do we have an example that uses the phrases "Click here" or 
> "more"? As well as being particularly poor link phrases, link 
> phrases like "Click here" make assumptions about how the user 
> will interact with the content. I know that's fine by us, but 
> it shouldn't be encouraged by us.
> 
> Gez
> 
> --
> _____________________________
> Supplement your vitamins
> http://juicystudio.com
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 29 August 2006 18:31:37 UTC