- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:24:38 +0100
- To: "Loretta Guarino Reid" <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Cc: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org, "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, "Bengt Farre" <Bengt.Farre@androtech.se>
On 21/08/06, Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com> wrote: > At this point, we have 15: 609, 720, 734, 755, 777, 778, 915, 920, 968, > 1068, 1105, 1174, 1299, 1331, 1376 > > You may want to review all the proposals for the same sort term > together, since they often have the same or similar responses. Some of the > relevant sort terms are "entered", "next-tab", and "popup windows". I've gone through the comment above ... Comment #734 The existing wording for SC 4.2.2 emphasises the point that it's applicable even if the content uses a technology that is not in the chosen baseline. The new wording contains a clause so that it's now only applicable for content that is *not* in the chosen baseline. Is that deliberate, as I would have thought it was possible that baseline content could equally fail this success criterion? Comment #755 Why is a clause necessary at all? Changing the setting of a complex control, such as a tree control, does not cause a change of context according to our definition. The change is within the control itself, and the role, state, and other properties would be relayed to the accessibility architecture (providing SC 4.1.2 is met). I agree with the commenter that the clause should be removed, as it's subjective and open to interpretation. Comment #915 suggest adding "might" in the final sentence of the example: "Other user agents [might] make the expanded form available as a tooltip or as contextual help for the abbreviation." Comment #920 Same issue as comment #734 in that the proposed wording is only applicable to content outside of the baseline. Comment #968 Same issue as comment #755 in that a clause isn't necessary, as the behaviour is part of the control's expected behaviour. Comment #1174 Same issue as comments #920 and #734, except commenter makes the point that the instructions to exit the content are described in technology included in the baseline. That's a good catch, but hasn't addressed in the solution. Comment #1299 Same issue as comments #969 and #755 - clause not necessary Comment #1331 Same as comments #1173, #920, and #734 Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 11:24:49 UTC