- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:34:09 +0200
- To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
Sorry wrong url. this is the correct one: http://www.w3.org/International/tests/results/lang-decl -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:33 PM To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: RE: Additional thoughts on language specification -----Original Message----- From: public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wcag-teamb-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jens Meiert Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 4:23 PM To: public-wcag-teamb@w3.org Subject: RE: Additional thoughts on language specification Well, okay, I zeroed in on "lang"/"xml:lang" attributes. But, as far as I understand your feedback, there is nothing - "except" for partially insufficient support of "xml:lang" - really harmful with this approach, isn't it? Roberto: Here there are some tests: http://www.w3.org/International/tests/sec-lang-decl-1.html
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2005 12:34:22 UTC