- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 06:16:25 -0700
- To: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <public-wcag-teamb@w3.org>
> Also shall we put in the example also the "alt" attribute for the <Video> > and <textstream> elements? Or we need to ask to apply it in another > Guideline (GL 1.1)? > > Also about system-language="xx" attribute... Shall we put in somewhere? > (Captions can be also in different languages for let the people to > understand the contents). > > And about <anchor> element? Shall we ask for title attribute, bla bla bla ? I tried to keep these examples focused just on this success criterion, that is, the caption. Hence, no alt attribute here. You are correct that GL 1.1 would list it as a technology-specific technique for SMIL, if the guide doc included a SMIL section. I will expand the examples to include captions in different languages. Should this be an advisory technique? > > I think that we really should have a document like the VoiceXML proposed by > Christopher in the list, with the GL / SC for SMIL. We should have a SMIL techniques document, like the HTML and CSS technique documents, but no one has signed up to produce one. I don't think we want to add a SMIL techniques document to the list of things that must be completed before we go to recommendation. It isn't surprising that the other guide docs don't include SMIL sections. But I worry that this will make it confusing to include SMIL sections for this guide doc. But I don't seem any other way to demonstrate techniques.
Received on Saturday, 1 October 2005 13:16:45 UTC