W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wcag-teama@w3.org > May 2006

#5 - Proposed resolution

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:54:15 -0500
To: <public-wcag-teama@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001a01c67911$bf6303a0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
 


Comment 


# 5        

Jason White   5/2/2006  

W2       

Conformance                

ED       

 

"If individual authored units do not carry a conformance claim, then the
claim must be based on the Web unit with the authored units in place."

 

      This is expressed in terms of claims rather than in terms of
conformance. It should be more accurately stated thus: 

"If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the
conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined as the level
of conformance, if any, attained by those Web units with all aggregated
content in place".

            

 

"See wording proposed above [in COMMENT]"  

 

 


Suggested resolution 


Accept

Adopting a shorter wording however as follows.

"If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the
conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined by those Web
units with all aggregated content in place".

 


Gregg

------------------------

Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
< <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848  

The Player for my DSS sound file is at  <http://tinyurl.com/dho6b>
http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 

 <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>  

 

 
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 17:54:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:40 GMT