- From: Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:10:17 -0500
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- CC: "'Li, Alex'" <alex.li@sap.com>, public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > > OK > Here goes > > Combined form is... > > 3.2 L2 SC3. Components that have the same functionality in multiple > delivery units within a set of delivery units are labeled consistently and > have consistent text alternatives (if any). > (Guide to 3.2 L2 SC3) > Looks pretty good. Do we need to include "and have consistent text alternatives (if any)."? I'm not sure we need to make any changes to the SC. We can clarify in the guide doc that the use of consistent text alternatives is how you'd meet this for functional non-text content if need be (ex. situation a: text-based components; situation b: non-text components). -Ben -- Ben Caldwell | <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu> Trace Research and Development Center <http://trace.wisc.edu>
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 21:10:50 UTC