RE: Action Item Bug: 1568

No

A change of focus AS A RESULT OF  a change of context is not a problem.

Only the opposite  ( a change of context as a result of a change of focus).


-----Original Message-----
From: public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wcag-teama-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Caldwell
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 11:13 AM
To: public-wcag-teama@w3.org
Subject: Re: Action Item Bug: 1568


Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> Ok
> 
> How about
> 
> When any component, including the delivery unit as a whole, receives 
> focus, a change of context is not triggered.
> 

Hmm, part of the reason we left the idea of loses focus out as I 
remember it was so that this SC could apply to the entire page. Wonder 
if we should add this back in:

When any component, including the delivery unit as a whole, receives or 
loses focus, a change of context is not triggered.

I think this closes the loophole Gez has raised (onblur firing an event 
that would cause a change of context).

However, when one page loses focus and anoteher page receives it a 
change of context has occured. Do we need to say something like "an 
unrequested change of context" or "... a change of context does not 
occur as a result"?

Thoughts?

-Ben