- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of detlev.fischer@testkreis.de <webmaster@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:54:01 +0000
- To: public-wcag-em-comments@w3.org,shadi@w3.org,e.velleman@accessibility.nl
The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'Approval for draft publication of WCAG-EM' (public) for Detlev Fischer. --------------------------------- Abstract ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) priority: mild I agree to reinstate the section Michael refers to, with a minor change. Current wording (actually wording of previous version quoted by Michael: "on evaluating the conformance of these selected web pages to the target level of WCAG 2.0 conformance" We have conformance twice here. Suggested wording: "on evaluating the conformance of these selected web pages to the targeted level of WCAG 2.0" Actually, there is practically no guidance regarding the evaluation of content bar a blanket referral to the Techniques, so perhaps this part should be deleted? --------------------------------- Introduction ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Using This Methodology ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Scope of Applicability ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 1: Define the Evaluation Scope ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 2: Explore the Target Website ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 3: Select a Representative Sample ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * ( ) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Step 5: Record the Evaluation Findings ---- * ( ) accept this section as draft * (x) accept this section as draft with the following suggestions * ( ) I do not accept this section as draft * ( ) I abstain (not vote) Priority: high Step 5.d: Provide a Performance Score (Optional) This optional step suggests three different scoring approaches: by aite, by page, and by instance. The first two are pretty uncontroversial. The third approach suggests a score calculation based on instances on the page "for which each WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion is applicable". In the last Eval TF Telco, there was a consensus decision (with one abstention) to remove this third type of scoring method: http://www.w3.org/2013/12/05-eval-minutes.html In a future version of WCAG-EM, we might express that there are different ways of calculating scores. If references are given, these might point to the approach that is currently being proposed (or anything that has emerged from work on UWEM 2 ?), the Accessibility Priority Tool used by Roger Hudson and others, or some other additional, informative graded scoring approach that can reflect the criticality of failed instances. These answers were last modified on 10 December 2013 at 09:53:34 U.T.C. by Detlev Fischer Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/WCAG-EM-20131129/ until 2013-12-17. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2013 09:54:06 UTC