W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Antw: Re: e2r: selection of papers and format of symposium

From: Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:16:37 +0000
Message-ID: <5093AB95.1050608@manchester.ac.uk>
To: Klaus Miesenberger <Klaus.Miesenberger@jku.at>
CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi Klaus,

we did panel sessions with questions for the Mobile - but it was still
took ages...

Si.


PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.

=======================
Simon Harper
http://simon.harper.name/about/card/

University of Manchester (UK)
Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk

On 02/11/2012 11:04, Klaus Miesenberger wrote:
>
> Good to hear from you Simon - hope you are well back!
>
>
> This is also my concern. My understanding was that we do not run a
> traditional presentation of papers but a discussion with the panel of
> authors.
>
> Participant har read the papers and we do not ask for presentation.
>
>
> If we ask for presentaitons, I would also opt for 2 symposia (e.g. a
> week inbetween.
>
>
> In the last telco my understanding was that we should go away from
> presenting papers but making it more disussion based.
>
>
> Klaus
>
>
> a.Univ.Prof.Dr. Klaus Miesenberger
> University of Linz, Institut Integriert Studieren
> Altenbergerstrasse 69, A-4040 Linz
> klaus.miesenberger@jku.at, http://www.integriert-studieren.jku.at/
> Tel: +43-732-2468-9232 Fax: ...-9322
>
> International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special
> Needs, ICCHP: http://www.icchp.org
> International Camps on Computers&Communication, ICC:
> http://www.icc-camp.info/
> Association for the Advancement for Assistive Technology in Europe,
> AAATE: www.aaate.net <http://www.aaate.net>
> eAccess+ The eAccessibility newtork: www.eaccessplus.eu
> <http://www.eaccessplus.eu>
> Austrian Computer Society, OCG: www.ocg.at/ <http://www.ocg.at/>
>
>
>
> >>> Simon Harper <simon.harper@manchester.ac.uk> 2.11.2012 11:13 AM >>>
> Hi Klaus,
>
> this is really great news - I agree wrt 1 and 2  - my worry is that we
> won't be able to run through all papers in the time we have available. I
> wonder if it is worth having 2 symposiums and 1 note?
>
> Si.
>
>
> PS I check my email at 08:00 and 17:00 GMT. If you require a faster
> response please include the word 'fast' in the subject line.
>
> =======================
> Simon Harper
> http://simon.harper.name/about/card/
>
> University of Manchester (UK)
> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
> http://wel.cs.manchester.ac.uk
>
> On 02/11/2012 08:50, Klaus Miesenberger wrote:
> > Dear colleagues,
> > 
> > unfortunatly Sandy blew away our telco this week  - I do hope that
> > Simon and others are not affected too much by this.
> > 
> > Following our timeline we have to notify submitters about acceptance
> > or decline of papers for the symposium - that's what I wanted to
> > discuss on Wednesday.
> > 
> > Here is a proposal, following a chair meeting we did in Linz, for both
> > acceptance and symposium structure (numbers refer to the list attached)
> > 
> > A) Acceptance our of 17 submissions
> > 1) Clear accept for 11 papers: 8, 11, 2, 3, 9, 12, 13, 17, 4, 16, 10
> > 2) Tend to accept for 3 papers: 6, 5, 15
> > 3) Not accept for 3 papers: 1, 7, 14
> > 
> > Our suggestion is to accept 1) and 2) due to the following reasons:
> > a) They all provide very valuable information on a new topic; pushing
> > this field as a new research area merits to include a broad perspective
> > b) It is hard to evaluate on basis of short abstracts. The difference
> > in quality is not that high.
> > c) And most important: Selecting these  14 papers would support a fine
> > structuring of the symposium:
> > 
> > B) Thematic Grouping of 14 papers:
> > 1) Guidelines and WCAG update: 4,9,10
> > 2) Tools: 2,(5), (6), 12, 13, (15), 17
> > 3) Workflow, Process, Services: 3, 8, 11, 16
> > 
> > C) Programme
> > INTRODUCTION (5 min)
> > Panel A: Guidelines (25 min)
> >    - prepared questions to all panelists (15)
> >    - open questions (10)
> > Panel B: Tools (60 min)
> >    - prepared question to all panelists (40)
> >    - open questions (20)
> > Panel C: Workflow, Process, Services (30 min)
> >    - prepared questions to all panelists (20)
> >    - open questions (10)
> > Follow up discussion for interested people
> > Before sending out notifications I wanted to ask if the group could
> > basically agree to this strucutre. I will inform all contributors that
> > the notification will be delayed till Monday. Therefore I would need
> > feedback till Monday noon next week.
> > 
> > Many thanks
> > Klaus
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > a.Univ.Prof.Dr. Klaus Miesenberger
> > University of Linz, Institut Integriert Studieren
> > Altenbergerstrasse 69, A-4040 Linz
> > klaus.miesenberger@jku.at
> > <mailto:klaus.miesenberger@jku.at>,
> http://www.integriert-studieren.jku.at/
> >
> > Tel: +43-732-2468-3751 Fax: ...-23751
> > International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special
> > Needs, ICCHP: http://www.icchp.org <http://www.icchp.org/>
> > International Camps on Computers&Communication, ICC:
> > http://www.icc-camp.info/
> > Association for the Advancement for Assistive Technology in Europe,
> > AAATE: www.aaate.net <http://www.aaate.net/>
> > eAccess+ The eAccessibility newtork: www.eaccessplus.eu
> > <http://www.eaccessplus.eu/>
> > Austrian Computer Society, OCG: www.ocg.at/ <http://www.ocg.at/>
>
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 11:17:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 November 2012 11:17:02 GMT