Re: Mobile Call

Dear Yeliz, Editors,

Thank you for considering my wording suggestions for the Background 
section. I also like the other changes but have some questions:

#1. The introduction paragraph now seems to be taking a different 
direction and tone to the rest of the call. I think we should align 
these sections in one way or the other, to avoid confusion.

#2. What was the rationale for removing the sentence "The Contributor 
further agrees that any derivative works of this contribution prepared 
by the W3C shall be solely owned by the W3C" from the copyright policy? 
As far as I understood, this clause is essential for allowing the 
editors to create the consolidated WG Note, which can be considered to 
be "derivative work".

Thanks,
   Shadi


On 27.3.2012 11:06, Yeliz Yesilada wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. We have now updated the call to address all the comments and it is available at:<http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Mobile>. You can also see the discussions at<http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Talk:Mobile>.
>
> Regards,
> Yeliz.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Yeliz Yesilada
> Middle East Technical University,
> Northern Cyprus Campus,
> Kalkanlı, Güzelyurt, KKTC,
> Mersin 10, Turkey
>
> URL: http://metu.edu.tr/~yyeliz
> Tel: +90 (392) 661 2994
> Fax: +90 (392) 661 2999
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)

Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2012 08:56:20 UTC