W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > July 2012

use of BibTex

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:12:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4FF1BA6B.3010305@w3.org>
To: Markel Vigo <markel.vigo@manchester.ac.uk>, giorgio brajnik <brajnik@uniud.it>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
CC: Simon Harper <Simon.Harper@manchester.ac.uk>, RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Hi All,

Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/ED-metrics#proceedings>

Currently we use the BibTex entry @article for the Research Report and 
@inproceedings for the individual papers contributed to us. These two 
are currently not directly related from the BibTex information.

Would it be a good idea to change @article to @incollection? It could 
make the Research Report an independent part of the Proceedings. Also 
the "series" field could be used instead of the "journal" to indicate 
that this Research Report is one in a series of hopefully many.

Does this make sense and is this a normal use of BibTex?


Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 15:13:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:42 UTC