Re: seminar planning timeline

Yup, think we can work within that.

+peter


On 13 February 2012 19:07, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> Seems fair enough.
>
> cheers
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:30:39 +0100, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> As per my action item to review the seminar planning timeline [1], I
>> propose the following new timeline:
>>
>> * -15 weeks - select topic, editors, and planning committee
>> * -14 weeks - announce pre-notification of call for papers
>> * -12 weeks - announce call for papers and scientific committee
>> * -8 weeks - deadline for paper submissions
>> * -6 weeks - review feedback to paper authors and rebuttal
>> * -4 weeks - deadline for final papers, announcement of program
>> * -2 weeks - publication of accepted papers and registration opens
>> * Day X - teleconference symposium
>> * +2 weeks - draft teleconference proceedings for review
>> * +4 weeks - announcement of teleconference proceedings
>>
>> [1] <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/planning#seminar>
>>
>> Best,
>>   Shadi
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
>    je parle franįais -- hablo espaņol -- jeg kan litt norsk
> http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
>

Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 21:57:13 UTC