- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:39:26 +0200
- To: giorgio brajnik <brajnik@uniud.it>
- CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Markel Vigo <markel.vigo@manchester.ac.uk>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Simon Harper <Simon.Harper@manchester.ac.uk>
Fixed. Thank you for catching these issues, Giorgio. On 8.8.2012 19:51, giorgio brajnik wrote: > Shadi, > a couple of minor points: > > in 1.1. when we say "Web accessibility can be viewed and defined in > different ways ..."; later on, the phrase "or Section 508" was cut. The > whole sentence should be > > Web accessibility can be viewed and defined in different ways [ > Brajnik08 ]. One way is to consider whether a web page/website is > conformant to a set of requirements such as those defined by WCAG 2.0 or > by Section 508. .... > > In 3.4 change Sucess --> Success > > Thank you for the good work! > > > Giorgio Brajnik > ______________________________________________________________________ > Dip. di Matematica e Informatica | voice: +39 (0432) 55.8445 > Università di Udine | fax: +39 (0432) 55.8499 > Via delle Scienze, 206 | email: brajnik@uniud.it > Loc. Rizzi -- 33100 Udine -- ITALY | http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio > > > On 08/08/2012 06:26 PM, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >> Dear RDWG, >> >> The pre-publication draft of "Research Report on Web Accessibility >> Metrics" is now ready. *Please read the following carefully*: >> >> Some changes were made since the approved Editor Draft of June 2012. >> These changes include: >> - Correcting spelling, grammar, and typographical errors; >> - Updating citations as discussed during teleconferences; >> - Edits to the Abstract and addition of Introduction text. >> >> Particularly the changes to the Abstract and Introduction need your >> attention. Unlike the rest of the symposium material, the document did >> not make it sufficiently clear that conformance to WCAG 2.0 itself can >> be evaluated which might unfortunately give readers the misapprehension >> that WCAG 2.0 cannot be evaluated, and/or is inappropriate to use within >> policy contexts, or that WAI is doing no work on related aspects of >> evaluation. This would be detrimental to our work on accessibility. >> >> >> The final draft, ready for publication, is available at: >> - >> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/WD-accessibility-metrics-report-20120712.html> >> >> >> >> >> Also find a diff-marked version highlighting the changes: >> - >> <https://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FRD%2F2011%2Fmetrics%2Fnote%2FED-metrics-20120608&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FRD%2F2011%2Fmetrics%2Fnote%2FWD-accessibility-metrics-report-20120712.html> >> >> >> >> >> *ACTION:* Please indicate any objections to these changes before our >> upcoming teleconference meeting on 15 August 2012. >> >> We're just a small step away from our first publication! ;) >> >> >> Regards, >> Shadi >> > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 09:39:58 UTC