W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > August 2012

Re: pre-publication draft for metrics report ready

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 11:39:26 +0200
Message-ID: <502A1CCE.5020304@w3.org>
To: giorgio brajnik <brajnik@uniud.it>
CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Markel Vigo <markel.vigo@manchester.ac.uk>, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Simon Harper <Simon.Harper@manchester.ac.uk>
Fixed. Thank you for catching these issues, Giorgio.


On 8.8.2012 19:51, giorgio brajnik wrote:
> Shadi,
> a couple of minor points:
>
> in 1.1. when we say "Web accessibility can be viewed and defined in
> different ways ..."; later on, the phrase "or Section 508" was cut. The
> whole sentence should be
>
> Web accessibility can be viewed and defined in different ways [
> Brajnik08 ]. One way is to consider whether a web page/website is
> conformant to a set of requirements such as those defined by WCAG 2.0 or
> by Section 508. ....
>
> In 3.4 change Sucess --> Success
>
> Thank you for the good work!
>
>
>    Giorgio Brajnik
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Dip. di Matematica e Informatica | voice: +39 (0432) 55.8445
> UniversitÓ di Udine | fax: +39 (0432) 55.8499
> Via delle Scienze, 206 | email: brajnik@uniud.it
> Loc. Rizzi -- 33100 Udine -- ITALY | http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio
>
>
> On 08/08/2012 06:26 PM, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> Dear RDWG,
>>
>> The pre-publication draft of "Research Report on Web Accessibility
>> Metrics" is now ready. *Please read the following carefully*:
>>
>> Some changes were made since the approved Editor Draft of June 2012.
>> These changes include:
>>   - Correcting spelling, grammar, and typographical errors;
>>   - Updating citations as discussed during teleconferences;
>>   - Edits to the Abstract and addition of Introduction text.
>>
>> Particularly the changes to the Abstract and Introduction need your
>> attention. Unlike the rest of the symposium material, the document did
>> not make it sufficiently clear that conformance to WCAG 2.0 itself can
>> be evaluated which might unfortunately give readers the misapprehension
>> that WCAG 2.0 cannot be evaluated, and/or is inappropriate to use within
>> policy contexts, or that WAI is doing no work on related aspects of
>> evaluation. This would be detrimental to our work on accessibility.
>>
>>
>> The final draft, ready for publication, is available at:
>>   -
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/note/WD-accessibility-metrics-report-20120712.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Also find a diff-marked version highlighting the changes:
>>   -
>> <https://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FRD%2F2011%2Fmetrics%2Fnote%2FED-metrics-20120608&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FRD%2F2011%2Fmetrics%2Fnote%2FWD-accessibility-metrics-report-20120712.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *ACTION:* Please indicate any objections to these changes before our
>> upcoming teleconference meeting on 15 August 2012.
>>
>> We're just a small step away from our first publication! ;)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>    Shadi
>>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2012 09:39:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 14 August 2012 09:39:58 GMT