W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > September 2011

RE: Minutes for Teleconference on 15 September 2011

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:17:47 +0800
To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Yeliz Yesilada <yyeliz@metu.edu.tr>
CC: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A98CAAEDA2FD@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
I would like to add my agreement to Yeliz' comments regarding the assessment and feedback to those submitting papers.


Vivienne L. Conway
From: public-wai-rd-request@w3.org [public-wai-rd-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joshue O Connor [joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie]
Sent: Friday, 16 September 2011 4:40 PM
To: Yeliz Yesilada
Subject: Re: Minutes for Teleconference on 15 September 2011

Yeliz Yesilada wrote:
> I think it would be good to dedicate one of our weekly meetings on this matter to basically create a review form.


> This review form would make sure that all the scientific committee members judge the submissions with the same set of criteria. I also think it's important to give feedback people.


>When they submit and their submission is rejected, it would be good to explain them why it was rejected. I prefer to do this scientifically rather than saying that sorry we do not have enough time for this.
[...]I think we can dedicate a meeting on how to select submissions?
what would be the review process?

Agreed, lets do that next week please.



This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 00:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:41 UTC