W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > October 2011

Re: collecting information about existing website accessibility evaluation methodologies

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:04:32 +0200
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: RDWG <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v3yuxuxmwxe0ny@widsith.eng.oslo.osa>
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:40:13 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> I don't think it is manageable to start adding individual papers. I  
> strongly prefer referencing something that is already published.

Fair enough. I'll prod Jonathon and see if he will publish it somewhere.

cheers

> Best,
>    Shadi
>
>
> On 26.10.2011 16:12, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:04:27 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear RDWG and Eval TF,
>>>
>>> Ref:
>>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Website_Accessibility_Evaluation_Methodologies>
>>>
>>>
>>> RDWG is collecting information about existing website accessibility
>>> evaluation methodologies. This will help the development of a WCAG2
>>> evaluation methodology but also serve future research and development
>>> activities. Please send information about existing methodologies with
>>> 1-2 sentence description to public-wai-rd@w3.org or directly edit the
>>> wiki page if you have access (RDWG participants).
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an unpublished paper by Jonathon O'Donnell et al, which looks at
>> reviews of Australian websites (universities, banks, and some others)
>> and talks about the topic. I have his permission to quote it (the bulk
>> of it is valuable I think, but some of it we don't need), but wonder if
>> I should put the content onto the wiki, or what...
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Chaals
>>
>


-- 
Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:05:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 October 2011 16:05:07 GMT