W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Accessibility evaluation methodology

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:41:27 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA016F7.4080607@w3.org>
To: Léonie Watson <lwatson@nomensa.com>
CC: "public-wai-rd@w3.org" <public-wai-rd@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Leonie,

Is this methodology documented publicly?

The idea is not to document organizations that carry out evaluations but 
rather existing, publicly documented methodologies to learn from.

I will clarify the wiki page accordingly.

Thanks,
   Shadi


On 20.10.2011 12:26, Léonie Watson wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> 	In response to Shadi's request for one/two sentence descriptions of accessibility evaluation methodologies:
>
> 	Nomensa manually evaluates a representative sample of pages against the full set of WCAG success criteria, and uses automated tools to evaluate a large sample of pages against a subset of WCAG success criteria. We also carry out an holistic evaluation of the site from the perspective of people with different disabilities/assistive technology requirements.
>
> Regards,
> Léonie.
>
> --
> Nomensa - humanising technology
>
> Léonie Watson, Director of Accessibility&  Web Development
>
> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333
> twitter: @we_are_Nomensa @LeonieWatson
>
> Nomensa Email Disclaimer: http://www.nomensa.com/email-disclaimer
>
> © Nomensa Ltd, King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 | Company number: 4214477
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 12:42:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 October 2011 12:42:04 GMT