W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Comments required for the webminar call

From: Yeliz Yesilada <yyeliz@metu.edu.tr>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:47:02 +0300
Message-Id: <2F7DF3B7-C301-4B2E-B1D7-671D2D1AFF7A@metu.edu.tr>
To: public-wai-rd@w3.org
This looks great to me. I have two suggestions and both of them are up to editors discretion:
1. I would put the publication in a separate subsection so that it is more obvious. Sub-sectioning will guide the reader better. 
2. Even though there is a inpara link to research questions, I would again put a subsection called "Further information" or "research questions" or "References" and I would put the list of links to Wiki page, to questions, and to RDWG page, etc. That way they would be more obvious.

Regards,
Yeliz Yesilada.

On 20 Aug 2011, at 11:06, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:

> Thank you Markel. Now we can edit it collectively. Once it is stable I would like to move it to a WAI page, or at least freeze it in the wiki.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Shadi
> 
> 
> On 19.8.2011 18:53, Markel Vigo wrote:
>> Hi Shadi, Shawn, all,
>> 
>> I updated the document as you suggest and have wikied the HTML.
>> You can find it available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Draft_version_of_the_call_for_papers
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> ----------------------------------
>> Markel Vigo
>> 
>> University of Manchester (UK)
>> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
>> 
>> PS: I check my email at 9AM and 5PM BST. If you require a faster response please include the word [fast!] in the subject line.
>> 
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 4:37 PM, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Markel, Shawn,
>>> 
>>> Please make sure to clearly indicate that this is a draft call so that people don't confuse stuff. Add both a [Draft] label to the title and some text below it to indicate the non-approved status of this call.
>>> 
>>> As to the wiki suggestion, Shawn, I thought we may want to have the final call be a WAI page rather than a wiki page; do you agree? If so, then it would be quite a hassle to convert the HTML into wiki code and back again. Not sure if wiki is the best tool for preparing the calls but I don't feel very strongly either way.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>>  Shadi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 19.8.2011 17:22, Shawn Henry wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Would it work to put this in the wiki for collaborative editing?
>>>> 
>>>> (Some of my comments are copy-edit level.)
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> ~Shawn
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----
>>>> Shawn Lawton Henry
>>>> W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>>>> e-mail: shawn@w3.org
>>>> phone: +1.617.395.7664
>>>> about: http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 8/19/2011 5:44 AM, Markel Vigo wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Simon and I have come up with an improved draft for the webeminar
>>>>> call. Find it at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3976331/webinar%20call.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please, send your comments and suggestions to this list before the
>>>>> next meeting so that by the end of next week we can released the call.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------
>>>>> Markel Vigo
>>>>> 
>>>>> University of Manchester (UK)
>>>>> Web Ergonomics Lab - Information Management Group
>>>>> 
>>>>> PS: I check my email at 9AM and 5PM BST. If you require a faster
>>>>> response please include the word [fast!] in the subject line.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
>>> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
>>> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
>>> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
> 
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 12:47:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 22 August 2011 12:47:48 GMT