W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-rd@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Which title? - Re: Please review: Draft Call which includes Use Cases

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 19:26:12 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20031008192530.018cee38@localhost>
To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>, "Markku T. Hakkinen" <hakkinen@dinf.ne.jp>, "Public-Wai-Rd" <public-wai-rd@w3.org>

Sounds good to me.
--w

At 03:01 PM 10/8/2003, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
>I would not leave visualizations out as that is what many people also do 
>understand and understand that they are inaccessible. You can have access 
>to the numbers in a table and still not have access to something similar 
>as good visualizations.
>
>As a compromise, maybe we could do something like "Making Visualizations 
>of Complex Data Accessible for Persons with Disabilities." ?
>Marja
>
>At 02:36 PM 10/8/2003 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>
>>Is the primary goal to make visualizations accessible or to provide 
>>access to data? If to provide access to data (which usually ends up 
>>presented in a visualization), I propose, "Making Large Data Sets 
>>Accessible for Persons with Disabilities."
>>
>>It still feels a little awkward, but "visualization" used out of context 
>>(i.e., just in a title) is likely to be misinterpreted  (e.g.,  PFWG is 
>>working on  "visual verification."  When I told someone our next topic is 
>>"visualizations" she thought we were doing "visual verification.")
>>
>>--wendy
>>
>>At 01:21 PM 10/8/2003, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
>>
>>>I prefer the title
>>>Making Visualization Technologies Accessible for Persons with Disabilities
>>>
>>>but maybe we should change "Visualization Technologies" to just 
>>>"Visualizations"? Technologies brings to my mind SVG etc. and that is 
>>>could but what about the image from Lee's talk describing collaborating 
>>>users with dots, adjacency and color codes, is that a technology too or 
>>>rather a technique. I think Visualizations will cover both or what do 
>>>others think?
>>>
>>>Marja
>>>
>>>At 11:06 AM 10/8/2003 -0400, Markku T. Hakkinen wrote:
>>>
>>>>Please review and comment upon the current draft call for position papers
>>>>at:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2003/09/call-vis-papers.html
>>>>
>>>>I'm looking forward to your comments.
>>>>
>>>>mark
>>
>>--
>>wendy a chisholm
>>world wide web consortium
>>web accessibility initiative
>>http://www.w3.org/WAI/
>>/--
>

-- 
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/
/-- 
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:26:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:36 GMT