- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 14:36:16 -0400
- To: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>, "Markku T. Hakkinen" <hakkinen@dinf.ne.jp>, "Public-Wai-Rd" <public-wai-rd@w3.org>
Is the primary goal to make visualizations accessible or to provide access to data? If to provide access to data (which usually ends up presented in a visualization), I propose, "Making Large Data Sets Accessible for Persons with Disabilities." It still feels a little awkward, but "visualization" used out of context (i.e., just in a title) is likely to be misinterpreted (e.g., PFWG is working on "visual verification." When I told someone our next topic is "visualizations" she thought we were doing "visual verification.") --wendy At 01:21 PM 10/8/2003, Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote: >I prefer the title >Making Visualization Technologies Accessible for Persons with Disabilities > >but maybe we should change "Visualization Technologies" to just >"Visualizations"? Technologies brings to my mind SVG etc. and that is >could but what about the image from Lee's talk describing collaborating >users with dots, adjacency and color codes, is that a technology too or >rather a technique. I think Visualizations will cover both or what do >others think? > >Marja > >At 11:06 AM 10/8/2003 -0400, Markku T. Hakkinen wrote: > >>Please review and comment upon the current draft call for position papers >>at: >> >>http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2003/09/call-vis-papers.html >> >>I'm looking forward to your comments. >> >>mark > -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 14:36:35 UTC