- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 04:37:38 +0200
- To: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Eval TF, While working on the final Editor Draft of WCAG-EM it occurred to me that reorganization of a few sections could lead to better clarity of the document. In particular: - Step 1.d (define evaluation procedures) seems more related to the use of techniques (or other methods) during evaluation (i.e. Step 4) than to Step 1. - Similarly, Step 3.d (include complete processes) seems more related to the evaluation than the sampling. In fact, it can be directly merged with Step 4.b (check for complete processes). - Steps 3.a, 3.b, and 3.c could be also merged together into a new section called "Select a structured sample" with a complimentary step "Generate a randomly selected sample" (we can tweak the titles). - We had also discussed combining Step 4.a (check for each success criterion) and Step 4.c (check for accessible alternatives). The information from Step 1.d fits nicely with these two sections. I would like to discuss this reorganization (through which none of the current guidance will be lost) with you during tomorrow's call. Feel free to send any initial thoughts to the list too. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 02:38:22 UTC