In depth analysis from Velleman, Eric on 2013-01-26 (public-wai-evaltf@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:59:50 +0000
To: Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org"<public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D063CE533923349B1B52F26312B0A466E249631@s107ma.bart.local>

Hi Detlev,

In the questionnaire you propose to leave out one of the goals as there are no big differences between the detailed and the in-depth reports: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/evaltfq7/results#x2620. However, there is a difference that is significant for what is current practice in the Netherlands:

- The detailed report looks at 'each page' for all SC,
- The In-Depth Analysis Report looks at SC and (only) gives "examples of pages where it is not conferment" (and more). Current practice in the Netherlands.

So I would like to keep the in-depth analysis in the document just to show that this is also an option for reporting.

Let me know what you think.
Kindest regards,

Eric

Received on Saturday, 26 January 2013 16:08:59 UTC