W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > February 2013

Re: graphic from Kathy

From: Ramón Corominas <rcorominas@technosite.es>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:15:19 +0100
Message-ID: <511A2447.1010101@technosite.es>
CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi all,

I apologise for the delay and absence, I was on holidays (smile). I hope 
I'm not late to comment about this...

1. I would change the position of the texts for the steps. Now it seems 
that the "step 5" is previous to "step 1" (in the natural reading order, 
since it is in the left-top). Maybe it is because of my narrow field of 
vision, but I always tend to start reading on the left side of the screen.

2. Although I understand the "evaluation cycle", it is still a bit 
strange that you "report findings" and from there you go to "define the 
scope". It seems to me that this would constitute a complete new 
evaluation, since the initial parameters are different, isn't it?

Regards,
Ramón.

Shadi sent a graphic from Kathy:

> The evaluation life cycle
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 11:18:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:17 GMT