W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > September 2012

Examples for evaluating the methodology

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 09:22:29 +0800
To: "shadi@w3.org" <shadi@w3.org>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A9CC96888C0D@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
Hi all

I approached one of the large clients that I'm currently working with to see if they would be okay with using their website to check our methodology against.  This is a library sub-section of a university website - which fits one of the examples of a part of a website that could be considered a website on its own merits.

I thought their comments might be a starting point in our discussions on how to assess the methodology.


Id like to understand more about how the data will be used, especially in relation to the publication aspect. Will the data be combined into other assessments and will it be de-identified?  I was also hoping that the Library would get some publications out of our data (perhaps jointly) so I want to ensure these activities are compatible.


Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(cs)
PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
Mob: 0415 383 673

This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

Received on Monday, 24 September 2012 01:23:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:22 UTC