W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2012

Re: draft minutes from day 1 of face-to-face

From: Michael S Elledge <elledge@msu.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:44:30 -0400
Message-ID: <508FF5DE.10906@msu.edu>
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Everyone--

Thank you for the notes--you certainly had a productive meeting!

One thought to add (about the definition/examples of a web page):

To me, the key is that it is content delivered via a web interface. That 
would include not only include a traditional HTML-based web page 
delivered through a browser, but also a server-based application that 
has its own portal/interface built with Java (or some other proprietary 
code), or, alternatively, an interactive PDF form delivered as part of a 

I just want to be sure that we don't fall into the trap (or that readers 
of our methodology assume) that the evaluation process applies only to 
html delivered through a web browser like Firefox. That was a limitation 
of WCAG 1.0 that WCAG 2.0 was supposed to remedy (platform/technology 

So my suggestion would be to include the other two instances (I'm sure 
there are others) as examples, too.


On 10/29/2012 1:30 PM, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/2012/10/29-eval-minutes.html>

Michael S. Elledge
Associate Director
Usability/Accessibility Research and Consulting
Michigan State University
Kellogg Center
219 S. Harrison Rd Room 93
East Lansing, MI  48824
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2012 15:45:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:23 UTC