W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Agenda Telco

From: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:38:09 +0200
Message-Id: <C620AC5B-4789-4B7E-BFC4-A591DB74B9E4@oracle.com>
Cc: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Regrets. I will not be able to attend this week 

Peter 

On Oct 10, 2012, at 11:11 PM, "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl> wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
> 
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 11 October 2012 at:
>  * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time
> 
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
> 
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> 
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
> 
> customized coutrynetics
> 
> AGENDA:
> 
> #1. Welcome, Scribe
> Minutes of previous meeting:
> <http://www.w3.org/2012/10/04-eval-minutes>
> 
> #2. Issue 9 - Random Sampling survey
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/9>
> 
> #3. Issue 1 - Discuss approaches for addressing tolerance
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/1>
> We have discussed about three parts of the evaluation output: (1) conformance to WCAG - yes/no; (2) some type of score - indicative to help "motivate" developers and decision makers; (3) report - to show the types of issues to explain the "severity" and guide developers on how to fix issues. These are closely linked together.
> 
> Would like to discuss about confidence this telco: What do we know about the relationship between the sample and the level of confidence of the evaluation output. A sample is always a sample, we could have missed something. How can we rate the confidencelevel of the output?
> 
> #4. Issue 5 – Number of pages to select in Step 3b
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/issues/5>
> 
> #5. Status of the graphics (continued)
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2011/eval/track/actions/5>
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Oct/0011.html>
> 
> #6. Other issues
> 
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 21:38:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:16 GMT