W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Graphic For Eval Procedure

From: Ramón Corominas <rcorominas@technosite.es>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:53:53 +0200
Message-ID: <506D78D1.2090807@technosite.es>
To: kathy@interactiveaccessibility.com
CC: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>, "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hello, Kathy and all,

 From a "low vision" point of view, I prefer the second one (it has 
better contrast). Howver, I like the first one since it conveys better 
the accessibility monitoring as a continuous work. However, since the 
reading sequence is from left to right, I tend to read first the "step 
5" and then the "step 1". Maybe the graphic could have the "step 1" on 
the top, and then continue clockwise to the next steps.

I also agree that some steps can be simultaneous and arrows (or steps) 
should overlap a bit (I have an idea on how to represent that, I will 
try to draw it by hand later).

In addition, I thing that the arrow from "step 5" doesn't necessarily go 
to the first step, but to the third. We usually don't change the scope 
between audits, nor have to explore again a website that we already 
know, so we go directly to the sampling process (and in some cases even 
this step is skipped).

My 2 cents ;)


Kathy wrote:

> Sorry about the subject line, I should have changed it.  I have done so 
> now so this thread does not get mixed up.  I appreciate you pointing 
> that out.
> I like your idea but I was wondering if you could outline a bit more 
> about what level of detail you think would be best.  If you can outline 
> it in text or bullets, I can come up with a graphic.   I do think we 
> need to be careful about how much text we have in the image so we may 
> want to consider having some of the text on the page and then bring in 
> some graphical elements.
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 11:56:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:23 UTC