W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > March 2012

RE: Review of new version methodology

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:10:30 +0800
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A9B518EFE300@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
HI all

I've been going through the new document and note the following in Section 3:

Step 1: requirement 1 - type - should be 'the', not 'he'
paragraph under requirement 1: grammar needs changing for the last sentence 'of what the evaluation should cover'

Detailed review: need to rephrase 2nd sentence "this includes counts of the...".
next sentence: change 'statics' for 'statistics'

Step 1c: requirement 1c : grammar - "evaluate for shall be defined" change to "Define the target WCAG 2.0 conformance level ("A", "AA", or "AAA").

The next sentence should be changed in the same way as above - don't end the sentence with 'for'.

Next sentence: ',' after AAA, - whole paragraph could be re-worded for the grammar.

Step 1d - requirement 1d - sorry grammar again

Sorry, better stop here.


Regards

Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT
PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
v.conway@ecu.edu.au
v.conway@webkeyit.com
Mob: 0415 383 673

This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
________________________________________
From: Velleman, Eric [evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
Sent: Thursday, 8 March 2012 7:55 AM
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Subject: Review of new version methodology

Dear Taskforce,

As you see a lot of changes have been made to the new version of the document.
Please review sections 2.1 and section 3:

<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306.html>

Please share with us your opinion on the following points to start with:

1. Your general impression of this version
2. Name change to: Web Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology.
3. Is the scope of applicability well covered?
4. Are the steps in section 3 a good approach. Do we need more steps, more detail...

Hope to speak to you all on the call.
Kindest regards,

Eric

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

CRICOS IPC 00279B
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 14:11:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:13 GMT