W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Agenda EvalTF thursday

From: Vincent François <vfrancois@accessibiliteweb.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:49:44 -0500
Message-id: <4F569488.2030303@accessibiliteweb.com>
To: public-wai-evaltf@w3.org
Hi,

Regrets for this Thursday and the four following ones... I'll be giving 
a11y training in Quebec, Ottawa and even take a week in France.

In order to be of some real help for the TF, what should I do right now? 
Re-reading the new methodology and provide feed-back? On a specific part 
of it? I would like to give more time, but I do want to aim at something 
useful for now.

-- 

Vincent François
Directeur général

*Coopérative AccessibilitéWeb*
1751 rue Richardson, bureau 6111
Montréal (Qc), Canada H3K 1G6

vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com 
<mailto:vincent.francois@accessibiliteweb.com>
http://www.accessibiliteweb.com <http://www.accessibiliteweb.com/>
Tél. : +1 514-312-3378
Sans frais : +1 877-315-5550



Le 12-03-06 06:08, Velleman, Eric a écrit :
> Dear Eval TF,
>
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 8 March 2012 at:
>    * 15:00 to 16:00 UTC
>    * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>    * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>    * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>    * 23:00 to 24:00 Western Australia Time
>
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>    -<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>    * +1.617.761.6200
>    * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
>
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>    * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>    * port: 6665
>    * channel: #eval
>
>
> AGENDA:
>
> #1. Welcome, Scribe...
>
> #2. New Methodology version
> There is a new version of the Methodology. What do we think. Is this a good change? Are things missing from our previous discussions? Would this work for you? Can we use this for our first draft? What is missing that is still a showstopper? The agenda for this item will be more finetuned following the discussion on the list.
>
> #3. New section 2.1 Scope of applicability
> Does this cover the evaluations we want to facilitate?
>
> #4. New section 3 Evaluation procedure
> What do we think of the new step by step approach? Are these the steps that are necessary or do we need more steps. Also: how much detail do we want to add
>
> #5. When can we publish a first draft
> It would be great is we can publish a first draft soon. What does the group think.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Eric
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 22:50:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:13 GMT