W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Aspects of an evaluator

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:01:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4FE399D1.2040409@w3.org>
To: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Alistair,

Having followed this thread but missed today's phone call, what is the 
problem with the current definition of "Evaluator"?

Best,
   Shadi


On 21.6.2012 19:02, Alistair Garrison wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In today's telecon, we discussed terms like independent when talking about evaluations.  The outcome appeared to be that what was needed was in fact a better definition for 'evaluator'.
>
> I'm not going to propose the whole definition for 'evaluator', however, just two aspects which we might consider including in the definition:
>
> Aspect 1) (of an evaluator) someone who is not responsible for the accessibility of the website being evaluated.
> Aspect 2) (of an evaluator) someone who is not associated with developing and maintaining the website or its content.
>
> Thoughts…
>
> All the best
>
> Alistair
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 22:02:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:14 GMT