W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > July 2012

DoC ID 9 implicit interpretable discussion

From: Velleman, Eric <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:25:26 +0000
To: "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D063CE533923349B1B52F26312B0A468407E6@s107ma.bart.local>
Dear all,

In the questionnaire [1] about DoC ID 9 [2] some of you indicated that it would be good to clarify the comment a bit more before we close the comment. Shadi did this in the comments field and there were some positive responses to that:

Shadi: "I think the issue is saying "determine who uses the website and how they use it ... important to define if a website .... is restricted to specific users"; Some people interpret this as a way to say "I only/don't have blind users" or such, and exclude other audiences. What we meant is the primary target audience and the context of use (public website vs intranet etc.). I think this section needs to be rewritten to avoid these misconceptions that have occurred."

As a result of this, I would like to propose a new resolution:

New Resolution: We will need to rewrite this section to avoid misconceptions
New Rationale: What we meant is the primary target audience and the context of use (public website vs intranet etc.). This section needs to be rewritten to avoid these misconceptions that have occurred.

Let me know if you like it so we can close the comment in our next teleconference call on thursday.
Kindest regards,

Eric



[1] In Questionnaire 3: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/evaltfq3/results#x2586
[2] Original comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wcag-em-comments/2012Apr/0000.html
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 21:25:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:14 GMT