W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > February 2012

Re: EvalTF agenda

From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:11:14 +0100
Message-Id: <506799D2-A4FD-4E10-AF2A-9F84D9572D2F@gmail.com>
To: Eric Velleman <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi all, 

Regrets, I have to attend another meeting.  I'll catch up from the minutes and on the list.

All the best

Alistair

On 22 Feb 2012, at 00:22, Velleman, Eric wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
> 
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 23 February 2012 at:
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UTC
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 23:00 to 24:00 Western Australia Time
> 
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
> 
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> 
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
> 
> 
> AGENDA:
> 
> #1. Welcome, Scribe…
> 
> #2. Is there more than pass and fail?
> The list had a discussion about not applicable. Should we address this in the Methodology?
> 
> #3. Three different samples is that possible?
> Seems to be some discussion about the possibility to have three different sampled resources. Short explanation by Eric.
> 
> #4. Evaluation clause 5
> Three evaluation level options proposed in the list. How do we think about them?
> 
> A new editor draft is in the making.
> Kindest regards,
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 13:11:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:13 GMT