W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > February 2012

RE: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February

From: Vivienne CONWAY <v.conway@ecu.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:48:58 +0800
To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, Alistair Garrison <alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com>, Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8AFA77741B11DB47B24131F1E38227A9B4D74AE0D1@XCHG-MS1.ads.ecu.edu.au>
Hi Eric & TF
Sorry I've been absent from the discussions this week - work/research have been incredibly hective.  I have tried to read to keep up with the discussions though.  I'm planning on being at tonight's meeting if possible.

I understand the sentiments expressed in the whole website vs defining the cope from the compliance statement.  I'm still not too sure on the wisdom of this, as I'm concerned it takes us away from encouraging the assessment of an entire website and seems to me would encourage people only to test the 'best' parts so that they look compliant.

The other points discussed all look okay to me.


Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT
PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
Mob: 0415 383 673

This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original message.
From: Velleman, Eric [evelleman@bartimeus.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 February 2012 7:33 PM
To: Alistair Garrison; Eval TF
Subject: RE: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February

Hi Alistair,

Would you still be able to read through the overview of the discussion I sent this morning and indicate what your feeling is about the places where I ask: " Is this ok?"
Wishing you a very pleasant holiday and thanks for all the valuable input sofar.
Kindest regards,


Eric Velleman
Technisch directeur
Stichting Accessibility
Universiteit Twente

Oudenoord 325,
3513EP Utrecht (The Netherlands);
Tel: +31 (0)30 - 2398270
www.accessibility.nl / www.wabcluster.org / www.econformance.eu /
www.game-accessibility.com/ www.eaccessplus.eu

Lees onze disclaimer: www.accessibility.nl/algemeen/disclaimer
Accessibility is Member van het W3C

Van: Alistair Garrison [alistair.j.garrison@gmail.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 1 februari 2012 9:36
Aan: Velleman, Eric; Eval TF
Onderwerp: Re: EvalTF Telco Agenda 2 February

Hi All,

I'm soon on holiday for two weeks, and shall unfortunately miss the next two telecons... also, no real email access...

So, I'll catch up on your thoughts, and consensus decisions, upon my return... and, greatly look forward to moving ahead with any new discussions...

All the best


On 31 Jan 2012, at 23:40, Velleman, Eric wrote:

> Dear Eval TF,
> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 2 February 2012 at:
>  * 15:00 to 16:00 UTC
>  * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>  * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>  * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>  * 23:00 to 24:00 Western Australia Time
> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>  - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>  * +1.617.761.6200
>  * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>  * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>  * port: 6665
>  * channel: #eval
> #1. Welcome, Scribe…
> #2. Changes to the last version of the Methodology
> Added citation code and marked the text from UWEM with a color and reference. Also added UWEM to the acknowledgements and to the references in the appendices A and B.
> #3. Discussion on procedure to express the scope, clause 3
> Follow up on the discussion we had the past week on the list. What does this mean for the current clause 3 on the scope of a website evaluation.
> #4. Discussion on sampling of pages, clause 4
> The three sample categories are currently filled with text from the Unified Evaluation Methodology for discussion. This discussion is related to agenda point #2.
> #5. Other matters
> Regards,
> Eric

This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information provided.

Received on Thursday, 2 February 2012 12:52:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:40:20 UTC