W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > August 2012

Re: AW: Comment #24 - Evaluating Templates with no content

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 01:24:05 +0200
Message-ID: <50356A15.20102@w3.org>
To: Kerstin Probiesch <k.probiesch@gmail.com>
CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Kerstin, All,

Currently the methodology is scoped to evaluating entire websites 
*after* they have been developed. Starting to expand this scope to 
special cases of evaluation could dissolve the purpose of the methodology.

Also, we are moving away from the initial question: what is the role of 
evaluating the *templates* (the empty shells) during post-development 
conformance evaluation?


Regards,
   Shadi


On 22.8.2012 23:18, Kerstin Probiesch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I also think that evaluating templates is important because of the reasons
> Vivienne mentioned in her mail. I also think that developers needs a
> feedback about the WCAG-conformance of the templates. I therefore concur a
> section about evaluation of templates as special case of our methodology.
>
> Best
>
> Kerstin
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Vivienne CONWAY [mailto:v.conway@ecu.edu.au]
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 13:55
>> An: Shadi Abou-Zahra; Eval TF
>> Cc: Eric Velleman
>> Betreff: Comment #24 - Evaluating Templates with no content
>>
>> Hi all
>> I thought I'd try to address some ideas about templates with no
>> content.
>>
>> In comment #24, Detlev mentioned that he "did not see how one woudl
>> evaluate the template on its own, instead of a particular instance with
>> all content rendered as web page."
>>
>> I've just been asked to evaluate a set of templates before they have
>> content added so that the developer can check the accessibility of them
>> before content is added and might have to be removed again for a re-do
>> of the page.  This does happen quite a lot, and we are also asked to
>> have our user testers look at sets of templates before content is added
>> as well.
>>
>> I think that as we're continually advocating that accessibility should
>> involved early in the development of websites, and then at every stage
>> of the life cycle of the website, we should see this as a good thing.
>> A developer designs a template for the client, and then makes sure that
>> this template is accessible.
>>
>> My only concern is that this may not really relate to the methodology
>> as we're talking about complete websites, and not single pages or
>> templates.  However, we are pitching the methodology as being relevant
>> for developers etc. also.  Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Vivienne L. Conway, B.IT(Hons), MACS CT, AALIA(cs)
>> PhD Candidate & Sessional Lecturer, Edith Cowan University, Perth, W.A.
>> Director, Web Key IT Pty Ltd.
>> v.conway@ecu.edu.au
>> v.conway@webkeyit.com
>> Mob: 0415 383 673
>>
>> This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>> email in error, please notify me immediately by return email or
>> telephone and destroy the original message.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Shadi Abou-Zahra [shadi@w3.org]
>> Sent: Monday, 20 August 2012 6:34 PM
>> To: Eval TF
>> Cc: Eric Velleman
>> Subject: [important] closed and open comments with actions
>>
>> Dear Eval TF,
>>
>> As a recap, please see the following actions for this week:
>>
>>
>> # Comments from Public Review (WD 27 March)
>>    - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments>
>>    - There were no comments on this disposition of comments from Eval TF
>> in the survey of 7 August 2012; All comments have been closed now.
>>    - *ACTION:* Let us know immediately if you have objections.
>>
>>
>> # Comments from Eval TF Review (ED 30 July)
>>    - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments-20120730>
>>    - Proposed resolutions available are for your review for all comments
>> except #24, #29, and #30, and an on-going discussion on comment #32.
>>    - *ACTION:* Review this disposition of comments by _today_.
>>
>>
>> # Comments from WCAG WG Review (ED 30 July)
>>    - <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-
>> evaltf/2012Aug/0034>
>>    - Editors working on proposed resolutions for these comments; let us
>> know any comments or thoughts you may have on it as well.
>>    - *ACTION:* Read the WCAG WG comments before the next call.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Shadi
>>
>> --
>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
>> Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
>> Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
>> Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
>>
>> This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient you
>> must not disclose or use the information contained within. If you have
>> received it in error please return it to the sender via reply e-mail
>> and delete any record of it from your system. The information contained
>> within is not the opinion of Edith Cowan University in general and the
>> University accepts no liability for the accuracy of the information
>> provided.
>>
>> CRICOS IPC 00279B
>
>
>

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 23:24:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:14 GMT