W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > August 2012

Comment #48

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 10:11:00 +0200
Message-ID: <5024C214.3090702@w3.org>
To: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
CC: Eval TF <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Dear Emmanuelle,

Your objection to the proposed resolution for comment #48 was discussed 
in yesterday's teleconference discussion:
  - <http://www.w3.org/2012/08/09-eval-minutes.html#item08>

We understood from your survey response that the proposed rationale for 
the resolution is incorrect:
  - <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/evaltfq4/results#x2630>

The rationale has now been updated to read "In many circumstances 
techniques may not be able to be provided and evaluation would have to 
proceed with out them. Techniques may not be available to the evaluator 
so that this clause cannot be required. Note also that techniques are 
not required for WCAG 2.0 conformance".

Please confirm whether you accept or object to the group resolution.

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office
Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG)
Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 08:11:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:14 GMT