W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-evaltf@w3.org > August 2012

Re: EvalTF Agenda Telco

From: Kathy Wahlbin <kathy@interactiveaccessibility.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:38:54 -0700
Message-Id: <B15D5906-F74F-48F3-B081-220BEE0EC9FE@interactiveaccessibility.com>
Cc: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
To: Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com>
Regrets from me as well. I thought this week's call was cancel. 

Kathy

Phone:  978.261.3106
Cell:  978.760.0682
Fax:  978.560.1251

On Aug 9, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com> wrote:

> After the fact regrets... when I deleted from my calendar the several weeks we weren't meeting, I seem to have deleted one too many...
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 8/7/2012 2:24 PM, Velleman, Eric       wrote:
>> Dear Eval TF,
>> 
>> The next teleconference is scheduled for Thursday 9 August 2012 at:
>>   * 14:00 to 15:00 UTC
>>   * 15:00 to 16:00 UK Time
>>   * 16:00 to 17:00 Central European Time (time we use as reference)
>>   * 10:00 to 11:00 North American Eastern Time (ET)
>>   * 07:00 to 08:00 North American Pacific Time (PT)
>>   * 22:00 to 23:00 Western Australia Time
>> 
>> Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner to find out the precise date for your own time zone:
>>   - <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>> 
>> The teleconference information is: (Passcode 3825 - "EVAL")
>>   * +1.617.761.6200
>>   * SIP / VoIP -http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP
>> 
>> We also use IRC to support the meeting: (http://irc.w3.org)
>>   * IRC server: irc.w3.org
>>   * port: 6665
>>   * channel: #eval
>> 
>> 
>> AGENDA:
>> 
>> #1. Welcome, Scribe
>> 
>> #2. Review of new documents
>> Please review by Wednesday 15 August 2012 the new editor draft and the updated disposition of comments that should address the comments received and discussed over the past weeks:
>> 
>> Updated Editor Draft:
>>   - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120730>
>> Updated disposition of comments:
>>   - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments>
>> Survey for comments:
>>   - <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/WCAG-EM20120730/>
>> 
>> The major changes are highlighted with notes in the Editor Draft. A full diff-marked version to the 27 March Public Draft is linked from the survey. The disposition of comments indicates the open comments, and provides references to previous surveys and discussion.
>> 
>> #3. Discussion in the Telco
>> Let us try to discuss the following comments that are still open during the Telco. Please also use the list:
>> 
>> Comment #19: Need to agree on opening an issue on "tolerance metrics" More explanation of the issue and proposed resolution:
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c19>
>> 
>> Comment #12: Need to agree on update in editor draft. There is a clarification of the concept of use-case in the updated section 3.4.1 Step 4.a (Check for the Broadest Variety of Use Cases). Does this clarify use case sufficiently for the moment or should we open an issue on use cases and come back tot that in a later draft.
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c12>
>> 
>> Comment #16: Need to resolve an objection. Is this objection solved by the updated section 3.5.3 Step 5.c (Provide a Performance Score (optional)? The section adds different scores. This methodology is not limited to automated evaluation or related sub-scores.
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c16>
>> 
>> Comment #48: Need to resolve an objection. The rationale is as indicated in the objection very much stressing the need to make it non-optional. We can decide to make no change and keep it optional (1) because we want to stay on the SC level as in WCAG2.0 and/or (2) open an issue to discuss making Step 1.e non-optional. Please note the open ended nature of the techniques.
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c48>
>> 
>> Comment #A1: Need to agree on the proposed resolution. The tekst says “..minimum set of web browsers and assistive technology to evaluate for shall be defined”. This is important because it is an important part of defining "accessibility support" Proposed resolution is therefore to make no change.
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c001>
>> 
>> Comment #A4: Need to agree on the proposed resolution. See:
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c004>
>> 
>> Comment #A6: Need to agree on the proposed resolution: Open an issue to further pursue the usage of the terms. See:
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c006>
>> 
>> Comment #A7: Need to agree on the proposed resolution: See:
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/comments#c007>
>> 
>> #5. TPAC in Lyon
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> <oracle_sig_logo.gif>
> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
> Phone: +1 650 5069522 
> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 
> <green-for-email-sig_0.gif> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment      
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 19:49:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:52:14 GMT